Court Reverses Termination for Default and Criticizes the Army Corps of Engineers for Failing to Acknowledge Its Defective Design
A decision was issued by the United States Court of Federal Claims on December 20, 2011, in Martin Construction Co. v. United States, a case involving a Corps of Engineers construction project in North Dakota. Martin was represented by Michael Payne and Joseph Hackenbracht, of Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman, and the case involved a termination for default by the Omaha District of the Corps on a multi-million dollar project involving the construction of a marina. The termination occurred because the Contracting Officer concluded that Martin was at fault for failing to complete the project by the required contract completion date. Martin had argued that the Corps’ design of the cofferdam (temporary dam), which was critical to the construction of the marina, was defective and that the contractor was effectively prevented from completing the marina according to the original schedule. The Court agreed that there was a defective design and found that the Corps’ designer had grossly underestimated the amount of water that would flow through the cofferdam.
The decision is extremely critical of the Corps of Engineers and amounts to a complete vindication of Martin. The Court ruled that the termination for default was wrongful and ordered a conversion to a termination for convenience. This, of course, now exposes the Corps to the payment of damages amounting to millions of dollars to compensate Martin for the costs incurred in attempting to deal with the defective design. The Court aptly noted that “The most troubling aspect of this case is the Corps’ adamant refusal to accept any responsibility for the defective design, even while Martin made every effort to comply with it.” The Court was also very critical of the Contracting Officer and stated that “Competent procurement officials would have acknowledged the agency’s obvious design mistake, made the necessary corrections, and afforded the contractor the contractor the additional time and money to complete performance.”
The Court concluded that the “evidence is overwhelming” that Martin was entitled to a time extension and that the termination for default was improper. Judge Thomas Wheeler quoted Martin’s geotechnical and scheduling experts, and he also quoted the Plaintiff’s brief by stating that “As Plaintiff’s counsel aptly pointed out, the Defendant ‘ignored the elephant standing amongst the teacups in the living room.” The decision is an important verification to the federal contracting community that a termination for default is a “drastic action” that will not be sustained unless the government can meet its burden of proof that the termination was justified. It was unfortunate, however, that Martin was forced to suffer the consequences of the “black mark” associated with a default termination until, as in this case, justice was ultimately served.
Michael H. Payne is the Chairman of the firm’s Federal Practice Group and, together with other experienced members of the group, frequently advises contractors on federal contracting matters, including teaming arrangements, negotiated procurements, bid protests, claims, and appeals.
Related posts:
- Turner Regains Army Contract After Court Reverses GAO Ruling Turner Construction Co., New York City, is looking to put $333 million back on its books after it won a bid protest regarding a new 745,000-sq-ft hospital planned for Fort Benning, Ga. Share on Facebook...
- Handyman, Court Might Have Rejected Donning/Doffing “Administrator Interpretation” Without Citing It. A Subtle Dig? We previously posted about the U.S. Labor Department’s Administrator Interpretation saying that unionized employers cannot exclude time spent donning and doffing certain protective equipment from compensable “hours worked,” even if an applicable union contract or practice treats the time as unpaid. On August 2, 2010, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that unionized [...]...
- DOL Reverses Its Position On Donning And Doffing “Protective Equipment” In Union Setting In a pronouncement applicable to unionized workplaces, this week the U.S. Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division issued an Administrator’s Interpretation stating that unionized employers cannot treat time spent donning and doffing certain ”protective equipment” as unpaid time, even if an applicable union contract or practice treats the time as unpaid. This reverses DOL’s previous positions [...]...
- Office of Administrative Hearings Office of Administrative Hearings...
- American Society of Safety Engineers offer safety tips for women in construction. American Society of Safety Engineers offer safety tips for women in construction....
- Interview with Alain de Botton, Architecture of Happiness Author “Bad architecture is in the end as much a failure of psychology as of design,” writes pop philosopher Alain de Botton in his heartfelt case for good building, 2006’s The Architecture of Happiness. Share on Facebook...
- Harvard’s Guidelines for Laboratory Design: Health and Safety Considerations Boston, Massachusetts – Date of Event: May 10, 2010 May 10 to 14. Acquire a solid understanding of the complex regulatory requirements and user demands of laboratory construction, renovation, reconstruction and decommissioning from the leading a… Share on Facebook...
- Rafael Viñoly’s Design of Kennedy Institute Unveiled Construction is scheduled to begin this fall on a center conceived by the late Senator Edward Kennedy to teach students about the inner workings of government. Share on Facebook...
- Tom Henry’s Installing Solar Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation Class Winter Park, Florida – Date of Event: May 17, 2010 A 5-Day Training Seminar — May 17-21, 2010 Installing PV systems that meet the highest efficiency of solar power. Two days include the site survey, using the sun pathfinder, PV system sizing, … Share on Facebook...
- A Consumer Guide to Filing Construction Complaints A Consumer Guide to Filing Construction Complaints...
- Chicago Museum Sues Arap Over Addition’s Engineering Ove Arup & Partners says it is “incredulous” over a lawsuit by the Art Institute of Chicago accusing the company of errors on the museum’s 264,000-sq-ft Modern Wing. Filed in federal district court in Chicago, the lawsuit claims the multidisciplinary engineer failed to discharge its obligations during design and construction of the wing, which opened [...]...
- Voluntary Arbitration Program Guide Voluntary Arbitration Program Guide...
- Keeping a detailed “paper trail” can save you money on a Handyman Contractor Keeping a detailed "paper trail" can save you money on a Handyman Contractor...
- Homeowners can end up financially devastated by hiring these illegal operators Nearly two dozen people went out on a limb by contracting without a license in San Bernardino. In so doing, they were caught in a sting operation conducted on May 26 and 27, 2010, by the Contractors State License Board (CSLB). The CSLB operation included support from the San Bernardino Police Department, the San Bernardino [...]...
- Exciting New York IT Jobs and Careers Exciting New York IT Jobs and Careers...
Find the Best Insurance 
Handyman insurance quotes is available on a state by state basis in Alabama,
Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut,
Delaware,
Dist of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana,
Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada,
New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North
Dakota,
Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina,
South
Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West
Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming. Find the best Handyman insurance quotes
from
some of the finest and solid insurance companies who compare liability
coverages based upon your own personal choices.
Handyman
Quotes 
Low Monthly Quotes 
Online Handyman
Quotes 